Match Report 090129

Nannas Vs Hydeoos

Score: 4-10

GF, CB, TK(GK), TH(1), DC, AW, TW(1, MOM), JH(2)

Was it hot??? F^%* yeah it was hot. Was it a good enough excuse to lose to the dirty Hyderoos?? F^#$ NO!!!! Not to mention we had two more subs than them. Shame Nannas, shame.

It seemed to be a very confused and rattled Nannas that hit the almost liquified court that night. Luckily the children were taken outside so not to witness such a miserable display.

Were the Hyderoos better than normal?? I for one think they might have been. Possibly they have imported some talent?? Maybe we need to take the Hyderoos to the tribunal and check that there has been no breech in the salary cap. An inquiry is what’s required here.

None the less it was a giant effort from the brown men to even take to the court after all the warnings in the news not to do any exercise in such weather. Did this deter us…….. no I say. Nothing but another challenge for the brown men. Going on this and past hot weather performances it may have to be said the Nannas play better in the cold. We are men of the snow not of the desert.

Special mentions should go out to some face saving goals from Jim, Tom and myself and some excellent work in goals from Kondo after being let down by his defence.

Sorry Nannas, I know it’s a bit negative and all but on a lighter note the dip in the bay after the game was a good call. Well organised and Dan was well shafted with having to get the fush and chups. But hey would we have got the extra sauces, including the tartare, had anyone else had gone. Also had it been Gee that had to go, as it was supposed to be, then we wouldn’t have got any potato cakes because he believe them to be impure. Even though he ended up eating most of them. Stop Tao, stop dwelling on the negative. The sand was hot but the water was cool and the the beer was cold and that’s what matters the most.

6 thoughts on “Match Report 090129

  1. Pingback: VIAGRA
  2. Pingback: Herbert
  3. Pingback: Evan
  4. Pingback: angelo
  5. Pingback: frederick
  6. Pingback: nick

Leave a Reply